Who killed Rajdeo Ranjan, the
correspondent of a Hindi newspaper, is a question that reverberates today
throughout the public sphere of Bihar and beyond and fuels private anxieties of
those living here. The more we know the more stridently we ask the
question ‘Who killed Rajdeo Ranjan?’ We know who did it. By asking the question
we are merely trying to point the needle of suspicion away from our own guilty
selves. The society as a whole killed Rajdeo Ranjan.
As I said in an earlier post ,"The
criminal element in our society has metastasized over the years and is now
firmly lodged in its bone marrow of the body politic. Cancer evokes a feeling
of helplessness, of resignation and an existentialist terror in those who are
condemned to watch it take its toll of their loved ones. The civil society finds itself
less and less able to count on its antibodies – the institutions, whether
formal or informal, those whose duty it is to contain crime - have deserted or
stand compromised." Crime has now an overarching presence in our society. It
is certainly not true for Bihar only; the entire country is afflicted by this
malady, and we the masses- Lenin’s “useful idiots”- are mobilized by the
various political parties which control our minds and our
consciences to cite a more heinous crime committed in Jharkhand to
play down the crime in Bihar, and vice versa. When Vyapam related murder in M P
comes to be mentioned it is countered by some other scandal in
Bengal. We merely displace the awareness of what afflicts our particular
situation by seeking solace in the fact that others are worse off.
But
even amidst the apathy, listlessness and an extraordinary passivity of society,
the media is supposed to go on playing its role of alerting a comatose
community to the various dangers that beset it. Consequently a small town journalist
infiltrates the territory of criminal warlords with the only resources that he
can pit against the mighty- his courage and an unflinching commitment to his
profession. As one of the news papers reported Rajdeo Ranjan had allegedly
procured a photograph showing a minister of the government paying obeisance to
the incarcerated ‘leader ‘in Siwan jail which became viral. One must not jump
the gun of the investigation in progress to establish the link but the act
itself was fraught with great risk and the alleged photograph is of great
public interest. Poor Rajdev believed that the mere awareness of such hobnobbing
of the bigwigs would enrage the community to some form of radical reaction .But
alas! Ours is not that kind of society; the people know it only too well how
the system runs; who controls the levers of power; what territories are
outlawed for the writ of law. And they are fine with it. Rajdev thought that he had
prized out a precious gem; the society dismissed it as the merest piffle. The
man who occupationally informed and educated public opinion was hopelessly out
of touch with the latest news about the society he lived in!
Therein lies the tragedy
of Rajdev (or any zealous police officer, civil servant, social activist and
all those who still care for moral hygiene in public life) and our
guilt by acquiescence, by indifference, by apathy. We profess a particular set
of principles and live by quite another; the naïve fall in the yawning gap
between the pretence and the essence.Messangers of bad news are murdered;
harbingers of good tidings rewarded is the new normal.
The post modernist media has moved beyond the
archaic morality related
to content, impartiality, objectivity, balance etc. With new patterns of media
ownership and control they have broken free and the earlier (self imposed) notions of accountability on their relation to the political system. The very top of the pyramid now
lines up for the privilege of washing the feet of the powerful and wealthy with
soda water and unguents, whatever the provenance of such power or wealth.
Prominent news anchors become single issue publicists, prime time celebrities
double up as secret agents for corporate world and influential
columnists become powerbrokers and pimps of politicians. They make hay while
the poor, ill paid reporter on the beat dies for a lost cause. The media today
is like a train in which the different compartments are headed for separate
destinations. Rajdev boarded the wrong compartment. To that extent we who knew
it and did not warn him are collectively the guilty party.
No comments:
Post a Comment